Goodyear tires have the best performance when it comes to on-road and winter condition traction and tread life. In terms of steering response and performance car tires, Goodyear tires maintain the dominance. However, Yokohama tires are a good option for on-road performance on off-road tires.
But that is not the complete picture of Yokohama VS Goodyear tires.
You need to get an even clearer idea about the comparison. To know more about the difference between the Yokohama and Goodyear tires, let’s get started.
Yokohama VS Goodyear Tires: On-Road Comparison
First comes the on-road comparison that is normal for passenger cars, minivans and SUVs. We make the comparison between Yokohama Avid Ascend VS Goodyear Assurance MaxLife. These are two-passenger car tires compatible with all seasons and are considered to be one of the best choices. The table below shows the performance difference between Goodyear and Yokohama tires.
|Good Dry Traction
|Better Dry Traction
|Good Wet Traction
|Better Wet Traction
|Better Fuel Economy
|Good Fuel Economy
|Product Line Up
|Notable Tire Family
|Avid, Tornante, Parada
|Assurance, Integrity, Fortera
|$95 – $200
|$92 – $204
A brief idea can be obtained from the table, but to get an even clearer idea let’s get into the description.
You get good dry traction from both Goodyear and Yokohama. But Goodyear Assurance Max Life has been rated to have better dry traction than Yokohama Avid Ascend.
Let’s talk about Goodyear tires first. It is made with a symmetric tread pattern that combines with a centre rib. The combination helps to maximize the rubber-to-road contact. More contact with the road means that the traction will be good.
Yokohama Avid Ascend LX is also made with a symmetric tread pattern. Its specially engineered tread profile allows it to have a maximum contact patch with the road surface, enabling good grip. But the problem is the delayed response to get a grip at high pavement temperatures. Although the delay is less than 1 second, it can be annoying to the user.
So, Goodyear Assurance MaxLife has better dry traction than Yokohama Avid Ascend LX. Overall, you will get maximum rubber-to-road contact and grip. But the slightly delayed response to get a grip means Avid Ascend lags behind.
Verdict:Goodyear Assurance MaxLife has better dry traction. .
Unfortunately, this is where both Goodyear and Yokohama slightly lag behind. But in comparison, Goodyear Assurance MaxLife has a better rating for wet traction performance. This is because of the tread pattern of the tire that includes block edges to ensure maximum grip. The tire is also designed to disperse out the water thanks to its deep circumferential grooves.
Yokohama Avid Ascend LX is made with an advanced L2 compound that is engineered to maintain a good grip on wet conditions. The L2 compound here comes with a unique polymer blend to improve traction. However, the tires are also well protected against hydroplaning resistance through their wide, circumferential and lateral grooves.
Verdict:Go for Goodyear Assurance MaxLife instead of Yokohama Avid Ascend LX for better wet traction.
In terms of durability, both Goodyear Assurance MaxLife and Yokohama Avid Ascend LX will show the same performance. The tread life warranty of Goodyear Assurance MaxLife is 85,000 miles and that of Yokohama Avid Ascend LX is also 85,000 miles.
Goodyear Assurance MaxLife is made with tread compounds that allow for good protection against wear. In addition, it has the Goodyear’s Wear Gauge which helps to put a visual indication of the tire’s tread depth. So, the user can change it when necessary. With Yokohama Avid Ascend LX once again its advanced L2 compound and internal construction allow it to have good wear resistance and handling ability.
Verdict:Both Goodyear Assurance MaxLife and Yokohama Avid Ascend LX have good durability.
Tire’s fuel economy depends on the rolling resistance, which has a direct relationship with the tread pattern. Rolling resistance is the resisting force a wheel faces when it is rolling over a surface. The lower the resistance is, the more will be the fuel consumption rate of the tire. So, definitely, you would want a tire that has lower rolling resistance.
Because shallower tread depth means that the tire will have lower rolling resistance and therefore better fuel economy. This is because lower tread depth means that the tire will have more heat dissipation rate which is good for reducing friction.
So, look for tread depth if you want to have a tire with better fuel economy.
Following is the table that compares the tread depth between Goodyear and Yokohama tires with different section widths and rim sizes.
|Tread Depth (Yokohama )
|Tread Depth (Goodyear)
|7.3/32 of an inch
|7.5/32 of an inch
|7.4/32 of an inch
|7.5/32 of an inch
So, in both cases, Yokohama tires have lower tread depth. This means it will lower rolling resistance and better fuel economy.
However, we want to clarify here that fuel economy does not depend on tread depth only and there are other major factors that dictate the fuel economy like tire size. But this is a comparison assuming every other factor is constant.
Verdict:Choose Yokohama Avid Ascend LX instead of Goodyear Assurance MaxLife for good fuel economy.
Yokohama VS Goodyear Tires: Sports Car Comparison
In terms of performance-based tires, Goodyear tires have an impressive lineup with over 35 products. However, there are a few differences in terms of traction and steering response of these two tires. We consider Yokohama Advan Sport v105 VS Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 to compare sports tire performance. Both of these are highly rated-performance tires.
Following is the table that shows the difference in performance between Yokohama and Goodyear tires.
|Good steering response
|Better steering response
|Notable Tire Family
|Eagle, Excellence, Ultragrip
|$110 – $1000
|$96 – $607
In terms of both dry and wet traction, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has the higher rating. With Goodyear Eagle F1 you get the benefit of Power Cushion and Active Braking technology. This helps the tire to maximize its contact patch with the road surface. A greater contact patch means that the traction will be good.
Meanwhile, Yokohama Advan Sport v105 is made with sport compound 5S. This is a micro silica compound which will help you to get a good grip. That along with the orange oil-enhanced tread compound help to get a good grip for the tires. The tread design here is asymmetric which helps for good traction.
But once again, due to a better contact patch, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 will show better traction than Advan Sport v105.
Verdict:Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has better overall traction than Yokohama Advan Sport v105.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has good durability. It is made with highly refined compounds with extra silica load. The combination of the two helps to withstand force and maintain good durability for the tires.
Yokohama tires are not lagging behind, however, especially with silica-infused compounds in the tire material and the tread design. One of the best Yokohama tires for longevity is the Advance Sport v105. .
Unfortunately, performance tires do not have the longevity of your typical passenger or off-road tires. But in terms of treadwear, you will get good results from both Goodyear and Yokohama tires.
Verdict:Both Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Yokohama Advan Sport v105 will have good durability.
Goodyear’s tires have amazing handling ability due to their steering response and cornering stability. Most of it has to do with sidewall construction and normally if the sidewall is stiffer then it has better control and response. Along with that, the combination of Power Cushion and Active Braking technology means that the tire has a shorter braking distance.
Yokohama tires are made with matrix rayon body ply which helps to improve the steering precision of the tires. Once again, the sidewall construction assists in the steering response of the tire.
But Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has been rated to be better in steering response than Yokohama Advan Sport v105. This means that its sidewall is slightly stiffer and accounts for better steering response.
In case, you want to explore beyond the Yokohama and Goodyear, there are other options like Kumho and Toyo tires that offer top-notch performance.
Verdict:If steering response is a concern, go with Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 over Yokohama Advan Sport v105 tires.
Yokohama VS Goodyear Tires: Winter Performance Comparison
The table below shows the winter performance comparison between Yokohama and Goodyear tires. For a detailed comparison, we consider Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 VS Goodyear Ultragrip Performance.
|Good Snow Grip
|Better Snow Grip
|Good Tread Life
|Better Tread Life
|Notable Tire Family
|$125 – $200
|$95 – $222
From the table, it can be observed that Goodyear seems to be the better choice in almost every major factor. Let’s get into a detailed discussion regarding this.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance has been rated to have a better snow grip than Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905. When it comes to having a good grip on snow there are two major factors. First is the overall tread design. The combination of biting edges helps to grip the snow. Second is the flexibility. More flexibility means that the grip and tire performance will be good.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance uses a tread compound that utilizes a unique blend of polymer and advanced silica technology to maintain this flexibility. Moreover, it contains the three-dimension TreadLock technology that helps to provide a good biting edge in snow.
Yokohama BluEarth V905 is also a good winter tire. It is made with a high silica compound that incorporates the orange oil technology to maintain good flexibility. Moreover, it also has biting edges because of the Triple 3D sipes. So, BluEarth V905 also has the combination of flexibility and a biting edge for good performance on snow.
But due to having a directional tread design to help easy evacuation of water and snow and good biting edges, Goodyear Ultragrip will have better snow grip.
Verdict:Go for Goodyear Ultragrip Performance instead of Yokohama BluEarth Winter v905 for better snow grip.
Goodyear tires have better tread life due to their large size tread blocks and also larger, deeper grooves that help it to maintain good tire life.
Yokohama tires also come with good tread wear ability especially due to its grooves and tread blocks.
Verdict:Goodyear tires have slightly better tread life and therefore if your priority is tire longevity, choose Goodyear.
Yokohama VS Goodyear Tires: Off-road Performance Comparison
Both Yokohama and Goodyear have an impressive lineup for off-road performance. But then again, there are differences in the performance parameters. For a more detailed comparison, we consider Yokohama Geolander-AT G015 VS Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac. The following table has been made for you to show the key differences in the Yokohama and Goodyear tires for the off-road conditions.
|Good Tread life
|Better tread life
|Notable Tire Family
|$135 – $665
|$125 – $328
The description of the parameters in the table is next.
When it comes to off-road performance you have to consider the result in sand, mud and gravel-type conditions.
Performance in Mud
Let’s consider the muddy surface first. In mud, the tires need to have a good biter, deep tread depth and high void ratio to evacuate away the mud and maintain a good grip. Wrangler Duratrac tires have sharp biters that help to slash through the mud. Along with that, the staggered shoulders and sidewall lugs help to maintain a good grip in the mud.
However, Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 has a higher void ratio but its tires lack biters. That’s why it is not as efficient in slashing through the mud.
Performance in Sand
Tires with good flotations and lighter weight mean that they will have good results in the sand. Wrangler Duratrac takes the lead here. This is because of lighter construction and stronger rim which ensures good safety in low PSI value.
But Geolandar ATG015, offers a robust bead locker and more biting edges. But the problem is that it is heavier in weight. Overall, that means the tire is not suitable for sandy surfaces.
Verdict:Choose Wrangler Duratrac instead of Geolandar ATG015 for better performance on off-road surfaces.
On Road Performance
Yokohama Geolandar ATG015 has better on-road performance due to its lateral grip and steering response. This is because of its closed-up shoulder lugs and the larger weight which reduces the overall dynamic response time.
Wrangler DuraTrac has a rounded contact patch and central lug on its tread design. Both of these allow for good traction and shorter braking distance.
Verdict:Go for Yokohama Geolandar ATG015 instead of Wrangler DuraTrac for better on-road performance.
Yokohama tires have good tread wearability due to their tread design which allows for improved tire longevity. It is made with Enduro compound having orange oil. This orange oil enables it to have lower rolling resistance and more tire wear-resisting ability. Its tread pattern has Triple 3D sipes on the tread that makes it sufficient for maintaining the grip.
Goodyear tires also come with excellent treadwear ability. It is made with Kevlar compound in it which makes it withstand force and have good wear resistance. The incorporation of Kevlar technology makes Goodyear Wrangler DuraTrac the better product in terms of treadwear resistance.
However, no matter which tires you choose, the longevity of your tires will depend on how you store tires when in no use. Make sure you store them in the right way.
Verdict:Go for Goodyear Wrangler DuraTrac instead of Yokohama Geolandar ATG015 for better durability.
Is Yokohama Fleva v701 a Good Option for Winter Tires?
No, Yokohama Fleva v701 is not a good option for winter tires because it has been made specifically for summer roads. Its rubber materials are not flexible and the sidewalls are stiffer for winter performance. So, if you are looking for Yokohama tires for winter, choose options like Iceguard IG52C, Iceguard IG53.
Can I Use Ultra 9NCG Instead of Iceguard IG53 on Snowy Roads?
Yes, you can definitely use Goodyear Ultra 9NCG instead of Yokohama Iceguard IG53 on snowy roads. This is because both of these are made for winter and have really good flexibility and snow grip to sustain.
Is Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 a Good Option for 4X4?
No, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is not a good option for 4×4. Due to relatively smaller tread size and shallower tread depth. This is a good choice for a passenger car but when it comes to 4×4, you can look for other options such as F1 Supersport, F1 Asymmetric 5.
Hopefully, that answers all the questions you had regarding Yokohama VS Goodyear tires. With the comparison between the two, you can easily choose the best option based on your needs. But keep in mind the cost and the availability of the product before making your decision.